It’s no secret that I thrive on using mind-mapping software to keep work projects organized. I use this package, but there are others – like this and this and this and – oh, here’s someone else’s summary. I like it because – rather than storing information in a hierarchical structure (folders and filenames, or more likely, filenames within folders within folders within folders – generally with the structure repeated across types of software uses – databases, word processing, email, etc.), you can store it conceptually. So for example, I have a "to-do" list mapped – where I have a branch of stuff that’s completed, another of stuff that I do on a regular basis, and one of stuff that comes in on an ad-hoc basis. For each item on each branch, I can link the heck out of all files related to that item – emails, calendar info, contact info, text files, statistical processing files, output, weblinks, etc. SO – rather than having to hunt for files of a different type related to the same project – it’s all there.
Ravelry is sort of similar. NO, it’s not a conceptual mind-map – not at all. But, it’s like a knitting project journal, with things stored (and hyperlinked) conceptually – projects on the needles, in queue, yarns, books, patterns – the whole shebang. Bonus that you can pull up (for any project) links of other folks who have done the same – and check their modification notes, yarn usage, gauge, etc.
What I see in a tool like this is how differently our minds function when trying to retrieve information online, vs. a hard copy. In print form, we generally go to alphabetical or at least hierarchical linear systems of information storage and retrieval You open a file drawer, and then go through files alphabetically until you find the one you need – if they are sorted by project, the projects themselves are first sorted alphabetically.
But think of trying to do the same online. It’s much more cumbersome. Even for something as simple as looking up the definition of a word. Think of dictionary sites where you first click on a hyperlink for the first letter – and then scan through for your word. It takes forever.
Think instead of a place like dictionary.com – where you type the word you want to look up in a search box, and a slew of info pops up – dictionary entries from a handful of dictionaries. There are also links to find words translated into other languages, thesaurus entries, word-based games like crossword puzzles, etc. The key is that information is organized conceptually for the user. (I have no doubt that there’s a LOT of hierarchical processing that occurs on the website’s part in retrieving the information for the user. That’s not what I’m talking about. I mean the process the user goes through…).
Anyway – what I find so striking (and at the same time utterly simple) is how tools like this change our daily lives. The same day that I started to play around with putting some of my projects onto Ravelry, I also found PDF files of knitting journal pages , designed by Grace and Alice Schnebly at this blog. I have been meaning to start keeping a written log of projects for some time now. Yes, some partial information makes it to my blog – but I talk about a lot of stuff on my blog, it’s not purely a knitting journal/log. Even if I used categories – project notes end up in multiple posts – sometimes scattered amongst a bunch of random information blogged about in that same post. So retrieving it is still rather cumbersome. (And the goal of my blog is not to keep detailed track of knitting projects – if it were, maybe it’d be somewhat less cumbersome – but still, not conceptually organized.)
Yesterday’s news posted at Ravelry.com summarized that there are presently 3063 beta users, 602 unclaimed invitations, and 7303 people on the waiting list for an invitation. They will shortly have two people working full time on getting invitations out and developing the site – so if you’re still on the waiting list, or you want to be – I trust that they will get to everyone eventually.
I do recommend checking out the site. During my first look, I never thought I’d ever put the time into summarizing project information. In short order, I was hooked. Much of it is not too laborious – as if someone else has used the same pattern or the same yarn, you click on it and it populates your information (you don’t re-type everything).
And I LOVE having all the information at my fingertips. I can easily take a peek at my current list of WIPs, and ponder my (ever expanding in-queue list), and it motivates me in a way that the pile of WIPs by my couch does not.
And it’s all organized more like my brain thinks of knitting projects – conceptually, not purely in a linear hierarchy.
2