Toby has come home from school a few times talking about a particular topic or book as "fact" not fiction. His latest focus has been bats: For the last few trips to the library, he has brought home books about bats. So bedtime reading has been all about bats lately – and ALL the books that he has chosen are factual books – full of photos and info about different kinds of bats and bat behavior. He tells us all about echolocation, and he is intrigued with the fact that bats are mammals (their babies drink milk) and he finds it hysterical that he is a mammal too. (He really would like to still have the mommy milk bar open, but that closed a few months before his 4th birthday – at a time when I had morphed into a "toy" rather than a source of food.)
So we are reading last night’s book, and it’s an "I Can Read!" book which Toby liked because *he* could read it to me (instead of vice versa). However it didn’t have much focus on details (or words like ‘echolocation’) so his attention started drifting. Meanwhile, Hannah had meandered in to share the story reading – and she mentioned a few times that hey! We could read Stellaluna! Since that was a great story about a bat too. I told her to go find it on the bookshelf, and we could read it too (or maybe stop part-way through the simpler fact book).
She found it – and I suggested to Tobes that we switch gears and finish the I Can Read! one the next night. He took one look at Stellaluna and exclaimed: "But THAT is not about facts, it’s FICTION" with some serious disdain in his voice. Like who on EARTH would want to read that – when it wasn’t Real Information. (I then leafed through Stellaluna, and decided it had WAY too much text to do last night anyway – it was already past bedtime). So we finished the simpler (but factual) book, and turned off the lights and got in bed.
The last bits of pre-sleep converstation went something like this. "Mama, why would anyone want to read FICTION anyway?" He was totally grappling with what the heck the appeal of a not-real story could be. Of course I expanded ad nauseum re. how imagination is really cool, and stories like that are great to listen to, etc.
But what I find so funny is how distinctly different the kids are in this respect. Hannah has ALWAYS been about the story and discourse of something. Before she had any words in her language, she carried on big long babble conversations – her language learning started at the discourse level. She would stand at the top of the landing (we lived in a split level house at the time), and tell us big babble "stories" – complete with hand gestures and you could just hear the voice switches from one character to the next – like what "speech bubbles" do in print. And to this day what floats her boat are stories and imagination and creating these worlds of characters and events.
Toby started utterly and completely at the single word level. He comes home from school and tells us all this micro-level detail about the school day – stuff we *never* heard about with Hannah. What floats his boat is the actual, real factual data.
And what’s funny is how utterly similar that is to his genetic make-up. My father is an absolute dear of a guy – but he’s totally an engineer "data, give me the data" kind of guy. Me, well, suffice it to say I’m a data analyst for much of the day. Hannah and Terry – they *thrive* on stories – the more embellished the better.
Terry and I were in hysterics last night about this latest fact/fiction episode. I suspect we’ll start bombarding Tobes with bat STORIES for a bit just to torture him
Don’t get me wrong, he loves a good story too (and specializes in telling and re-telling ones he finds particularly funny), but fact/fiction discussions will continue for some time I bet.
1